The individual who wrote the note is DPMO Intelligence Research Officer Warren Gray. The contents of the note is based upon his work in the POW issue for the past 20 years in the Army, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and in DPMO. During that time he was Chief, Site Development Office, Joint Casualty Resolution Center, Nakhon Phanom, Thailand in 1973-74, as an Army Major. As a DoD civilian he was the Lao-Cambodian Team Chief; an intelligence analyst; Chief of the POW Team during Desert Storm in 1991, Chief of the Current Operations Division in DPMO, and intelligence collection manager. His collection team controlled all HUMINT, SIGINT and IMINT support to the POW issue for years. In late 2001 he was selected as the collection manager for the DIA POW/MIA Analytic Cell, and he returned to DPMO in 2002.
Page 1 of 1
From: Gray, Daniel W. Mr., OSD-DPMO
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 3:16 PM
To: 20 Personnel within DPMO
Gentlemen: This being my last day in DPMO, I wanted to say so long to each of you since you are truly representative of the few good people left in DPMO. As of today I have 19 years and 8 months as a civilian.
Since I was denied access to work the POW issue (regarding Southeast Asia) by Joe Harvey when I returned on
2 February 2002 from the position of Collection Manager with the DIA POW/MIA Analytic Cell, and since I
have done essentially little or nothing since then, I figured it was time to go of my own free will.
I remain extremely disappointed regarding many aspects of the POW issue, but this is neither the time nor place
to go into detail about those many issues. I do plan to sit at home and write and may publish details of the listing
below later. I anticipate it will include at a minimum the fact that the military personnel in DPMO have effectively
been "reorganized" out of this military issue; failure of this organization to respond to a report of live Americans
in SEA; the 185 report; POWs moved from Laos to Vietnam; the Schederov report about Hrdlicka; why I feel
the Lao have not and never will cooperate in the issue; Lao retention of a file cabinet containing POW
information that we never requested; my proposal to approach Lao doctors in Beijing who worked previously
with American POWs in NE Laos; the DPMO attitude towards Stony Beach; my position on the Speicher case;
my position on the Deferred and No Further Pursuit cases, and as you can see, this would be a long listing since
these few topics are but the tip of the iceberg. I was never introduced to the DASD during the two years back
which was probably a good thing since I would have taken him through several of the topics listed above.
Although my plans were to go into full retirement and help my wife with seven grandchildren, after I decided I
would retire and announced my plans, I was offered two jobs with security firms that specialize in conducting
background investigations. I have 20-years experience as a counterintelligence special agent in the Army
conducting those type investigations, so I have accepted the position of Consultant / Investigator with a private
corporation, and will conduct background investigations from home.
My hat is off to each of you; good luck in this issue. I am sure I left off a few names above that I wanted to say
good-bye to and if I remember later, will call them.